2013 Polaris Ranger 800 Crew Top Speed and Performance

Overview of the Polaris Ranger 800 Crew

The Polaris Ranger 800 Crew is a beast in the world of utility side-by-sides. Designed for both work and play, this machine packs a punch with its powerful engine and rugged build. When it comes to performance, enthusiasts often want to know about its top speed and acceleration. While it’s not a sports car, the Ranger 800 Crew has some impressive capabilities that make it a favorite among off-road adventurers and workers alike.

Acceleration and Speed Metrics

The Ranger 800 Crew is not built for racing, but its acceleration can still surprise you. The official figures show that it can reach 0-60 mph in approximately 10-12 seconds, depending on various conditions. For those who prefer metric, that translates to 0-100 km/h in about the same time frame. Here’s a quick look at the performance metrics:

Metric Time
0-60 mph 10-12 seconds
0-100 km/h 10-12 seconds

While those numbers may not seem earth-shattering, keep in mind that this is a utility vehicle designed for hauling and towing. It’s not just about speed; it’s about getting the job done efficiently.

Factors Affecting Acceleration and Top Speed

Several factors can influence the Ranger 800 Crew’s acceleration and top speed:


  • Weight Load: Carrying heavy loads can significantly affect performance. The more weight you add, the slower your acceleration will be.

  • Terrain Type: The surface you’re driving on plays a crucial role. Mud, sand, and steep inclines can hinder acceleration, while hard-packed dirt or gravel allows for better grip and speed.

  • Tire Pressure: Properly inflated tires enhance traction and control, leading to better acceleration. Low tire pressure can cause slippage and slow you down.

  • Engine Condition: A well-maintained engine will perform better. Regular oil changes and maintenance checks can keep your Ranger in peak condition.

Different Road Surfaces and Their Impact

The surface you traverse can make or break your experience with the Ranger 800 Crew. Here’s how different terrains affect its performance:


  1. Paved Roads: On smooth surfaces, the Ranger can achieve its top speed more easily, making it feel more like a sport utility vehicle.

  2. Loose Gravel: This can lead to wheel spin, which might delay acceleration. However, the Ranger’s four-wheel drive helps maintain control.

  3. Mud: While fun, mud can be a challenge. The Ranger may struggle to gain speed due to slippage but can still pull through with its robust torque.

  4. Steep Hills: Climbing steep inclines will test the Ranger’s power. While it may not be the fastest, its torque allows for steady climbing.

In summary, while the Polaris Ranger 800 Crew may not compete with sports machines on a racetrack, it offers solid performance for a utility vehicle. Its acceleration and top speed are influenced by various factors, making it a versatile choice for those who need a reliable workhorse that can also tackle some fun off-road adventures.

Speed Comparison with Competitors

When considering the Polaris Ranger 800 Crew, it’s essential to look at how it stacks up against its competitors in the utility side-by-side market. While the Ranger is known for its versatility and ruggedness, other models also bring their own strengths to the table. Let’s dive into the numbers and see how they compare in terms of maximum speed and acceleration to 100 km/h (62 mph).

2013 Polaris Ranger 800 Crew Top Speed

As previously mentioned, the Ranger 800 Crew can reach a top speed of around 50 mph (80 km/h). While this may not seem fast compared to other vehicles, it is more than adequate for a utility vehicle designed for work and recreation. Here’s how it compares to some of its main competitors:

Model Top Speed (mph) Top Speed (km/h) 0-100 km/h (seconds)
2013 Polaris Ranger 800 Crew 50 80 10-12
Can-Am Commander 800 60 96 9-10
Yamaha Viking 700 54 87 11-12
John Deere Gator XUV 825i 50 80 11-13

From this table, it’s clear that the Can-Am Commander 800 takes the lead in both top speed and acceleration, making it a solid choice for those who prioritize speed. The Yamaha Viking 700 and John Deere Gator XUV 825i are close competitors, but they don’t quite match the Commander’s performance.

Acceleration Insights

Acceleration is another critical factor to consider. Although the Ranger 800 Crew can reach 0-100 km/h in about 10-12 seconds, it’s essential to recognize that this isn’t the fastest in its class. Here’s how the acceleration compares:


  1. Can-Am Commander 800: With a 0-100 km/h time of around 9-10 seconds, it clearly has the edge when it comes to getting up to speed quickly.

  2. Yamaha Viking 700: While it accelerates reasonably well, clocking in at about 11-12 seconds, it still falls short of the Commander.

  3. John Deere Gator XUV 825i: Similar to the Ranger, it takes about 11-13 seconds to reach 100 km/h, making it a comparable option for those who value utility over speed.

Owner Experiences

Owner feedback on the Polaris Ranger 800 Crew is generally positive, especially regarding its reliability and versatility. Many users appreciate its ability to handle a variety of tasks, from hauling materials on a job site to providing a fun ride on trails. However, some owners have noted that while the Ranger performs admirably, it doesn’t have the same exhilarating speed as some of its competitors.

Many enthusiasts value the Ranger’s stability and handling over sheer speed. The ability to navigate rough terrains and carry heavy loads often outweighs the need for high top speeds. Owners frequently mention that the Ranger’s strong torque and four-wheel-drive capabilities make it an excellent choice for off-road adventures, even if it doesn’t lead the pack in acceleration.

In summary, while the Polaris Ranger 800 Crew may not be the fastest utility vehicle out there, it holds its own in a competitive market. Its blend of performance, reliability, and utility makes it a popular choice among owners who prioritize function over speed.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *